Filed Under: Topic > Rock Music > "Only the Wildest and Craziest": Kuryokhin's Neo-Avant-Garde on the Russian Radio
"Only the Wildest and Craziest": Kuryokhin's Neo-Avant-Garde on the Russian Radio
[2 items]
1 00:00:02,000 --> 00:00:05,360 ...jazz musicians, or avant-gardists. 2 00:00:05,520 --> 00:00:06,880 I'd like to think 3 00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,480 that our program is very avant-garde and cool. 4 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:12,960 I would even call it radical. 5 00:00:13,120 --> 00:00:14,840 Our program is dedicated to 6 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:19,400 the most unbelievably radical music of all times and all peoples. 7 00:00:19,560 --> 00:00:22,000 We go from the early Medieval period 8 00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:25,520 right up to post-post-post punk and post-industrial 9 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:28,600 mixed with thrash, heavy, and death metal. 10 00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:34,120 Basically, we'll take any facet of musical life 11 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:36,280 from any age or nation... 12 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:39,280 As long as it was radical in its time. 13 00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:43,320 It would be just as appropriate to listen to the Sex Pistols, 14 00:00:43,480 --> 00:00:47,760 who were radicals in their time, as it would be to listen to Bach, 15 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:49,600 - who was also... - Bach? 16 00:00:50,560 --> 00:00:54,640 - Bach? - He was also extremely radical in his time. 17 00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:58,840 Plus, we will be hosting a whole variety of guests. 18 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:01,360 These will be famous pioneers 19 00:01:01,520 --> 00:01:04,720 and people who can tell us extraordinary things. 20 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:07,560 People who have made their mark on music, 21 00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:11,680 - both in Russia and globally. - Of course, and we'll also bring 22 00:01:11,760 --> 00:01:13,520 new names to the fore. 23 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:15,960 That is, people who for whatever reason 24 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:19,360 sit undeservedly in the shadows, 25 00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:23,200 having been major pioneers and innovators in their time. 26 00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:26,640 People who for some ideological or commercial reason 27 00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:30,320 have been relegated to the bottom shelf, 28 00:01:30,480 --> 00:01:34,600 and whose creations are unavailable to today's listener. 29 00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:38,080 Right, that's the introduction over. 30 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:40,400 Let's get into our first 31 00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:43,640 avant-garde, alternative, radical piece. 32 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,080 I disagree with that characterization. 33 00:01:46,240 --> 00:01:50,840 What does "alternative" mean? I just don't get it. 34 00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:53,280 It must be alternative to something. 35 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:55,520 - Yes... - But we have no alternative. 36 00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:58,600 What we're going to listen to is very traditional. 37 00:01:58,760 --> 00:02:02,800 It's very traditional, elegant, beautiful, and sad. 38 00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:05,920 And I would say that's what makes it radical. 39 00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:09,360 Actually, all music is radical, as we were just saying. 40 00:02:09,520 --> 00:02:14,120 You have to understand it in the context in which it is situated. 41 00:02:14,240 --> 00:02:18,360 That's the starting point for identifying what's radical. 42 00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:22,560 Fine, but why can one piece of music not be alternative to another? 43 00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:26,640 I mean, this piece, the first number on this record, 44 00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:29,400 might be alternative to to our next one. 45 00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:32,840 Yes, within the context of the program. 46 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:35,680 I don't dispute the context. 1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,880 Looking at the name, this is the piece that... 2 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:06,240 We actually played two pieces that ran into each other. 3 00:00:06,360 --> 00:00:09,880 The second piece is simply called About the Professor. 4 00:00:10,040 --> 00:00:13,600 Speaking of professors, our listeners will remember 5 00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:17,000 that I promised them a guest last time. 6 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:19,920 And a guest they shall have! 7 00:00:20,360 --> 00:00:25,200 We had to work very hard to get this man into the studio 8 00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:29,920 because he's been hidden away for practically the last 20 years. 9 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:34,480 He's a fantastic musician, one of the greats. 10 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:38,560 He was a cult figure in 1950s Leningrad, 11 00:00:38,720 --> 00:00:41,920 a legend on the experimental music scene. 12 00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:45,800 In recent years, he's been almost invisible. 13 00:00:45,960 --> 00:00:49,360 He has long since changed his profession. 14 00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:53,080 He's a well-known doctor, 15 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:56,720 though he's getting on a bit these days. 16 00:00:57,560 --> 00:00:58,920 Please welcome 17 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:04,440 that infamous cult musician of the '50s, Vladimir Olegovich Volkov. 18 00:01:04,600 --> 00:01:08,240 To his friends and those who love him, 19 00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:11,880 he is simply "Professor Volkov". Hello, Vladimir Olegovich. 20 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:17,120 Good evening, Seryozha and Sasha. I'm so grateful for the invitation. 21 00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:20,880 It wasn't easy deciding whether or not to join you on air. 22 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:25,200 I don't expect to be asked to speak on the radio these days. 23 00:01:25,360 --> 00:01:30,640 And of course, back in our day, there weren't programs like this one. 24 00:01:30,800 --> 00:01:37,040 They didn't broadcast radical, avant-garde music back then. 25 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:40,800 Vladimir Olegovich, bear with us a moment. 26 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:43,840 I'm going to get into a bit of theory, I'm afraid. 27 00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:46,000 Our listeners will forgive me. 28 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:49,120 It seems to me that art, and music in particular, 29 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:51,960 can only exist as a real, living organism. 30 00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:55,160 It has three essential elements: the traditional, 31 00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:58,440 the mainstream in the center, and the avant-garde. 32 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:02,720 When one of these components is missing, especially in music, 33 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:05,040 the result is flawed. 34 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:08,320 Right now, all we have is the mainstream. 35 00:02:08,480 --> 00:02:11,880 Our entire pop scene is... We have no avant-garde at all. 36 00:02:12,040 --> 00:02:14,480 Avant-garde isn't commercially viable. 37 00:02:14,640 --> 00:02:18,440 Those who experimented in the past are no longer able to, 38 00:02:18,560 --> 00:02:24,160 because life is so hard that people are totally taken up by it. 39 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:27,480 There's no room for experimentation, 40 00:02:27,640 --> 00:02:30,640 and no real tradition of it either. 41 00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:34,800 Except for Theremin, the brilliant acoustic engineer who invented 42 00:02:34,960 --> 00:02:38,120 an ingenious instrument, the Thereminvox, in the '20s. 43 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:41,840 On the whole, we have no tradition of genuine experimentation 44 00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:46,080 as has always existed in the West, where all the radical thinkers 45 00:02:46,200 --> 00:02:49,520 have that strong European tradition of the avant-garde. 46 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:53,520 That's why there are so few people who have done things 47 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:57,200 that were truly unusual, strange, wild, 48 00:02:57,360 --> 00:03:00,920 or even unthinkable at the time. 49 00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:05,720 And that's why it's so important that we have people with us 50 00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:11,360 who can tell us about those times, what life was like, how it all happened. 51 00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:13,840 I think this is just fascinating. 52 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:18,240 If I may, I just want to add that 53 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:20,800 I'm particularly interested to hear 54 00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:25,880 how it all came about in what seems like the distant past to us now. 55 00:03:26,040 --> 00:03:29,120 - At least, to me as... - You weren't even born yet. 56 00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:31,360 - Right. - And I was a kid. 57 00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:35,000 I mean, as a representative of the younger generation. 58 00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:39,640 I should also say that Vladimir Volkov started out as a jazz guitarist. 59 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:45,600 He played with several pop-symphony ensembles of the time. 60 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:50,480 Notably, he did a long stint with Alexander Tsfasman's orchestra. 61 00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:52,960 He worked briefly with Utyosov. 62 00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:55,800 Later, he played with a number of collectives 63 00:03:55,960 --> 00:04:00,880 while continuing to experiment. And these experiments... 64 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:03,080 But that's enough from me. 65 00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:06,280 Seryozha, you're absolutely right. 66 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:08,880 There's no avant-garde without tradition. 67 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:13,320 It's like trying to produce an abstract painting 68 00:04:13,480 --> 00:04:16,320 having never been to art school. 69 00:04:16,480 --> 00:04:21,080 It's dilettantism, or opportunism, I would say. 70 00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:26,560 The point is, there is tradition in the Russian avant-garde, 71 00:04:26,720 --> 00:04:29,920 in both the Soviet and contemporary avant-garde. 72 00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:35,880 You just mentioned several famous musicians and conductors 73 00:04:36,040 --> 00:04:38,960 who were traditionally radicals. 74 00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:41,800 I would say Utyosov was 75 00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:44,760 emotionally radical. 76 00:04:45,880 --> 00:04:48,920 And Tsfasman was intellectually radical. 77 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:53,120 You may not have heard of the Pokrass brothers... 78 00:04:53,280 --> 00:04:55,000 Of course, we have. 79 00:04:55,160 --> 00:04:59,960 They had a wonderful jazz orchestra, and were radicals of the heroic genre. 80 00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:03,040 Remember the song? "We're the red cavaliers..." 81 00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:05,000 - Of course. - There you go. 82 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:10,480 Believe it or not, these traditions fed into 83 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:16,120 the subsequent timid development of the musical avant-garde in Russia. 84 00:05:16,280 --> 00:05:20,440 Vladimir Olegovich, could you tell us briefly what made you do it? 85 00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:23,760 You were a famous musician, in wonderful orchestras. 86 00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:29,880 So, what made you... My older friends have told me that 87 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:33,320 you were the first to scrape a guitar in concert. 88 00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:36,400 And there's a story about how you gave a concert 89 00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:40,000 during the war in a trench with Clavdiya Shulzhenko. 90 00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:45,040 You played a 25-minute solo full of crazy twanging, 91 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:49,360 squealing, grinding, the lot. Is this true, or is it a myth? 92 00:05:49,520 --> 00:05:54,280 It's partly true. Clavdiya and I parted ways after that 93 00:05:54,440 --> 00:06:00,680 because she didn't like that solo, and I took offense. 94 00:06:00,840 --> 00:06:05,240 I actually started experimenting completely by accident. 95 00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:11,840 The war was over and we were celebrating Victory Day. 96 00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:14,840 I was in a bombed out building in Berlin. 97 00:06:15,440 --> 00:06:16,640 And I came across... 98 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:21,640 several records and some random magazines. 99 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:24,160 Music magazines, in German. 100 00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:27,520 That's how I first learned there was this other music, 101 00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:32,080 Western avant-garde music. This was the time, you remember... 102 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:35,640 Of course, you don't remember. It was the time of 103 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:39,280 - the Iron Curtain. - I lived a bit under the Iron Curtain. 104 00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:43,480 - It wasn't so bad by then. - I caught the very end of it. 105 00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:48,480 Anyhow, those recordings, those LPs, 106 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:52,080 are what got me searching. 107 00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:54,920 - Also... - What was on those records? 108 00:06:55,040 --> 00:07:01,160 - That famous guitarist, Speedy West. - He's very famous. 109 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:05,040 - Got going in the '40s, I know the guy. - Yes, so... 110 00:07:05,200 --> 00:07:09,920 I tried experimenting with steel guitar, but we had no steel guitars back then. 111 00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:11,920 It was funny, actually. 112 00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:15,200 We held the body of the guitar to a table... 113 00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:18,400 - You used a gas mask? - No, we held the body down, 114 00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:20,160 my bandmate shook the neck, 115 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:24,440 and we got a sound that was a bit like a steel guitar. 116 00:07:24,600 --> 00:07:28,760 - Sounds mental. - In fact, I think that 117 00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:32,720 for the younger generation who make up most of our listeners 118 00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:36,400 this will be fascinating, because this is where 119 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:39,640 our Russian avant-garde begins. It all starts here. 120 00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:41,760 These are its roots.
In the first episode of what turned out to be his last project, Sergei Kuryokhin explained that “dogs” was the derogatory term jazz musicians used to dismiss avant-garde performers. This is why, Kuryokhin continues, he and his co-host Aleksandr Ustinov have decided to name their new radio show, broadcasted on Radio-1 Petrograd, “Your Favorite Dog [Vasha liubimaia sobaka]”—because “we wanted our show to be very avant-garde, even extremist.”
After his adventures in television and politics in the early to mid-1990s, Kuryokhin returned to music, articulating a definition of musical avant-garde or “extremism” that helps clarify his scandalous political and media performances. The music selected for the show, he explains, is supposed to be “the most extremist” and “the most avant-garde” of its time, but depending on context, that could mean the Sex Pistols or Bach—whose works sounded absolutely shocking to their respective contemporaries.
This definition aligns Kuryokhin’s conceptions of art and politics with those of Russian Formalist critics like Viktor Shklovsky (1893-1984) and Yuri Tynyanov (1894-1943). These thinkers understood the evolution of the literary-artistic-political sphere as based on a continuous dialectic between tradition and avant-garde, where the one cannot exist without the other (Kuryokhin augmented this duo with a third tendency—“the mainstream”). In this context, Kuryokhin is consistently interested in the most shocking and revolutionary genres, which are meant to “defamiliarize” (Shklovsky) and, therefore, revitalize worn-out artistic and political strategies and devices.
In the course of his radio show, Kuryokhin describes his favorite music—from industrial, post-industrial, and Japanese “noise terrorism” (shumovoi terror), to English dark folk, Tibetan chants, and klezmer—by reiterating, almost as a comical refrain, a group of adjectives conveying the highest possible degree of insanity (ogoltelyi), chaos (oshalevshii), wildness (dikii) and even stupidity (otupevshii). As part of this search for novelty, Kuryokhin repeatedly changed the name of the short-lived program, because he thought “it would be boring” for a show to always retain the same name. The program first became Nasha malenkaia rybka (Our little fish), and, later, Russkii liudoed (The Russian cannibal). The second of these names referred to National Bolshevik retro-futurist surreal artist and noise music pioneer Aleksandr Lebedev-Frontov (1960-2022), around whom Kuryokhin created a whole mythology. Supposedly, nobody had seen him, but rumors described him as very old, covered in scars, and prone to throwing hot mushroom soup at his fans.
Kuryokhin evidently conceived his radio show as an attempt to create an avant-garde, “extremist” tradition. Alongside mythologized figures like Lebedev-Frontov, the program’s guests included underground artists Dmitry Prigov (1940-2007) and Sergey “Afrika” Bugaev (1966), as well as Alexander Dugin. In the episode featured here, the tradition in question is—in typical Kuryokhin style—totally invented. The episode’s guest was the fictional “Professor Vladimir Olegovich Volkov,” played by Kuryohkin’s close friend. The “Professor” allegedly played 25-minute cacophonic solos and deafening noise music while simultaneously performing with patriotic, mainstream Soviet-era artists like Leonid Utesov (1895-1982) and Klavdiya Shulzhenko (1906-1984) back in the 1950s and 1960s. Equally invented was the “forgotten” tradition of Soviet experimental music that Kuryokhin claims “Volkov” represented. As in his “Lenin-mushroom” prank, Kuryokhin reveals the ideological, or performative underpinnings of tradition itself while paradoxically highlighting the importance of creativity in the shaping of identity and collective memory.
After his adventures in television and politics in the early to mid-1990s, Kuryokhin returned to music, articulating a definition of musical avant-garde or “extremism” that helps clarify his scandalous political and media performances. The music selected for the show, he explains, is supposed to be “the most extremist” and “the most avant-garde” of its time, but depending on context, that could mean the Sex Pistols or Bach—whose works sounded absolutely shocking to their respective contemporaries.
This definition aligns Kuryokhin’s conceptions of art and politics with those of Russian Formalist critics like Viktor Shklovsky (1893-1984) and Yuri Tynyanov (1894-1943). These thinkers understood the evolution of the literary-artistic-political sphere as based on a continuous dialectic between tradition and avant-garde, where the one cannot exist without the other (Kuryokhin augmented this duo with a third tendency—“the mainstream”). In this context, Kuryokhin is consistently interested in the most shocking and revolutionary genres, which are meant to “defamiliarize” (Shklovsky) and, therefore, revitalize worn-out artistic and political strategies and devices.
In the course of his radio show, Kuryokhin describes his favorite music—from industrial, post-industrial, and Japanese “noise terrorism” (shumovoi terror), to English dark folk, Tibetan chants, and klezmer—by reiterating, almost as a comical refrain, a group of adjectives conveying the highest possible degree of insanity (ogoltelyi), chaos (oshalevshii), wildness (dikii) and even stupidity (otupevshii). As part of this search for novelty, Kuryokhin repeatedly changed the name of the short-lived program, because he thought “it would be boring” for a show to always retain the same name. The program first became Nasha malenkaia rybka (Our little fish), and, later, Russkii liudoed (The Russian cannibal). The second of these names referred to National Bolshevik retro-futurist surreal artist and noise music pioneer Aleksandr Lebedev-Frontov (1960-2022), around whom Kuryokhin created a whole mythology. Supposedly, nobody had seen him, but rumors described him as very old, covered in scars, and prone to throwing hot mushroom soup at his fans.
Kuryokhin evidently conceived his radio show as an attempt to create an avant-garde, “extremist” tradition. Alongside mythologized figures like Lebedev-Frontov, the program’s guests included underground artists Dmitry Prigov (1940-2007) and Sergey “Afrika” Bugaev (1966), as well as Alexander Dugin. In the episode featured here, the tradition in question is—in typical Kuryokhin style—totally invented. The episode’s guest was the fictional “Professor Vladimir Olegovich Volkov,” played by Kuryohkin’s close friend. The “Professor” allegedly played 25-minute cacophonic solos and deafening noise music while simultaneously performing with patriotic, mainstream Soviet-era artists like Leonid Utesov (1895-1982) and Klavdiya Shulzhenko (1906-1984) back in the 1950s and 1960s. Equally invented was the “forgotten” tradition of Soviet experimental music that Kuryokhin claims “Volkov” represented. As in his “Lenin-mushroom” prank, Kuryokhin reveals the ideological, or performative underpinnings of tradition itself while paradoxically highlighting the importance of creativity in the shaping of identity and collective memory.