Table of contents
- → Volume Abstract: "Inventing the Post-Soviet Public Sphere: Media Culture of the Russian 1990s" by Maya Vinokour
- → Introduction. “From Perestroika and the ‘Wild’ 1990s to ‘Putin’s Russia’: A Multimedia History” by Maya Vinokour
- → Chapter 1. “The Sociological Turn: Public Opinion Polling and the Dream of an Open Society” by Bradley Gorski
- → Chapter 2. “The Disappearing Reader: The Disintegration of the Press-Reader Relationship in the Soviet/Post-Soviet Press, 1985-1995” by Courtney Doucette
- → Chapter 3. “Russian Media in the 1990s, Fully Disclosed: Gore, Tabloids, and Countercultural Nationalism” by Fabrizio Fenghi
- → Chapter 4. “The Rock-and-Roll State: Popular Music, Print Media, and Soviet Bureaucracy” by Rita Safariants
- → Chapter 5. “B.U.Kashkin: The Underground Seeking the Public in the 1990s” by Daniil Leiderman
- → Chapter 6. “Russia’s Gay (and Not-So-Gay) Nineties: Sexual and Gender-Expression Pluralism in the first post-Soviet Decade” by Thomas Keenan
- → Chapter 7. “The Revolution of the New Narod: Perestroika, GKChP, and the Televised Post-Soviet Subject at Vzgliad/ ViD” by Pavel Khazanov
- → Chapter 8. “Memory and Media in Post-Soviet Russia: The 1990s to the Present” by Maya Vinokour
Chapter 7. “The Revolution of the New Narod: Perestroika, GKChP, and the Televised Post-Soviet Subject at Vzgliad/ ViD”
This chapter investigates the televisual sources of the nationalist authoritarianism that has defined Russia after 2000. Khazanov argues that the popular perestroika-era television show Vzgliad, along with its successor, ViD, helped shape early post-Soviet Russian audiences into a new narod. The teams crafting this updated, mediatized narod represented its future as emancipatory, but not necessarily liberal: though they worked to defeat the August 1991 GKChP-led coup, they remained distant from the liberal-democratic ambitions of late-Soviet intellectual elites. Instead, they shaped the narod as the stateless, apolitical subject of an essentially anarcho-libertarian system. Though the blurriness of this collective identity was arguably necessary to unite divergent interests against the GKChP, this same quality became problematic in the later 1990s, when the new narod proved incapable of coalescing around a common vision of post-Soviet statehood. This void at the heart of Russian liberalism, in turn, set the scene for Russia’s return to authoritarianism under Putin.