Table of contents
- → Volume Abstract: "Inventing the Post-Soviet Public Sphere: Media Culture of the Russian 1990s" by Maya Vinokour
- → Introduction. “From Perestroika and the ‘Wild’ 1990s to ‘Putin’s Russia’: A Multimedia History” by Maya Vinokour
- → Chapter 1. “The Sociological Turn: Public Opinion Polling and the Dream of an Open Society” by Bradley Gorski
- → Chapter 2. “The Disappearing Reader: The Disintegration of the Press-Reader Relationship in the Soviet/Post-Soviet Press, 1985-1995” by Courtney Doucette
- → Chapter 3. “Russian Media in the 1990s, Fully Disclosed: Gore, Tabloids, and Countercultural Nationalism” by Fabrizio Fenghi
- → Chapter 4. “The Rock-and-Roll State: Popular Music, Print Media, and Soviet Bureaucracy” by Rita Safariants
- → Chapter 5. “B.U.Kashkin: The Underground Seeking the Public in the 1990s” by Daniil Leiderman
- → Chapter 6. “Russia’s Gay (and Not-So-Gay) Nineties: Sexual and Gender-Expression Pluralism in the first post-Soviet Decade” by Thomas Keenan
- → Chapter 7. “The Revolution of the New Narod: Perestroika, GKChP, and the Televised Post-Soviet Subject at Vzgliad/ ViD” by Pavel Khazanov
- → Chapter 8. “Memory and Media in Post-Soviet Russia: The 1990s to the Present” by Maya Vinokour
Chapter 2. “The Disappearing Reader: The Disintegration of the Press-Reader Relationship in the Soviet/Post-Soviet Press, 1985-1995”
This chapter considers transformations of the press during perestroika and immediately after the Soviet collapse. On the example of the popular daily newspaper Komsomol’skaia pravda, Doucette shows that, between 1985 and 1995, the voice of the reader all but disappeared from the printed page: gone were letters and articles by readers, interactive activities, and announcements of reader-centric events like surveys, telethons, and receptions. This change was no mere casualty of a more general turn away from print media and toward television, but the result of deliberate editorial decision-making. The erosion of the Soviet-era relationship between readers and newspapers, the author argues, undermined the democratic potential of the press—and of early post-Soviet society as a whole—by discouraging popular investment in civic life.